In Schachter v. Canada, 1992 CanLII 74 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 679, Lamer, C.J. said at p. 24: The benefits with which we are concerned with here is a monetary benefit for parents under the Unemployment Insurance Act, 1971, not one which parliament is constitutionally obliged to provide to the included group or the excluded group. What parliament is obliged to do, by virtue of the conceded s. 15 violation, is to equalize the provision of that benefit. The benefit itself is not constitutionally prohibited; it is simply under-inclusive.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.