[113] The basic test for determining causation remains the “but for” test. This was recently reaffirmed in Resurfice v. Hanke, 2007 SCC 7 at para. 24, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 333 The “but for” test requires the plaintiff to show that the injury would not have occurred but for the negligence of the defendant: Athey v. Leonati, 1996 CanLII 183 (SCC), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458. In special circumstances where it proves unworkable the law has recognized exceptions to the basic “but for” test and has applied the “material contribution” test.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.