Does the fact that the award is worded as a three award of three and not as a majority of all is not fatal?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Zwirner v. University of Calgary, 1977 ALTASCAD 210 (CanLII):
The fact that the award is worded as an award of three and not as an award of a majority of them is not fatal and any words to the effect that it was an award of all may be treated as surplusage: See White v. Sharp (supra).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the consequences of a court awarding a lump sum award of costs in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for refusing to award an award of interest in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What damages would have been awarded under a "generous assessment" by the majority of the Court of Appeal for loss of expectation of life? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will arbitrator determine the wage rates for year three of a three year collective agreement? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an offer made three days before trial valid? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the words “for the purpose of hunting” in s.45(1)(b) of the Criminal Code been interpreted? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the relevant consideration for a lump sum of spousal support awarded to a payor who has increased her income significantly after separation? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the consequences of the Accused being charged with a major sexual assault? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when awarding spousal support? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a court bound by law to award costs in favour of the successful party against the unsuccessful party? (Alberta, Canada)
