The appellants further argue that the availability requirement brings questions of foreign law into the committal process, a development said in United States of America v. Freimuth (2004), 183 C.C.C. (3d) 296, 2004 BCSC 154 at paras. 44 to 49, to be contrary to the rule (expressed in McVey v. United States of America, 1992 CanLII 48 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 475 at 528, 77 C.C.C. (3d) 1 per La Forest J.) that the extradition judge is not to assess foreign law.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.