As authority for this proposition, the authors quote, in a footnote, the following statement from Quick v. Quick (1864), 3 Sw.& Tr. 442, at 447: It is familiar practice enough to receive the unsworn declarations of the testator in evidence, for the purpose of arriving at his general intentions where his competency is in dispute, or where there is any imputation of fraud in the making of his will. For in such cases the state of his mind and affections is in itself a material fact, of which such statements are the fair exponents.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.