One way the trial judge avoided the need to resolve some of the problems she perceived with the credibility of the complainant’s evidence, including when it conflicted with her mother’s evidence, was by discounting them as referable to peripheral matters, as a trial judge is entitled to do: R v. W. (R.), 1992 CanLII 56 (SCC), [1992] 2 S.C.R. 122, at pp. 134, 135-36.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.