Bauman J. referred to other authorities and to extracts from the legislative debates during which the Attorney General referred specifically to the concept of “opting in.” He did not rest his conclusion on the statements of the Minister but took comfort from that discussion. He also found support in the judgment of Sigurdson J. in Atkinson v. Klassen, 2000 BCSC 1831, who referred to the: strong presumption against the retrospective effect of a statutory provision unless “such construction is expressly or by necessary implication required by the language”… (para 64)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.