What is the standard of review for an application for judicial review of a statutory tribunal?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Ricard v. The Superintendent of Motor Vehicles, 2014 BCSC 129 (CanLII):
The starting point in the analysis on an application for judicial review of a statutory tribunal is to identify the applicable standard of review. It is common ground that on this application, reasonableness is the appropriate standard of review: Nagra v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2010 BCCA 154 at para. 17; MacNeil v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2012 BCCA 360 at para. 32.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a member of a judicial or quasi-judicial tribunal be held absolute immunity from action for comments made in a decision made pursuant to a statutory duty imposed on the tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review in a judicial review of an employment tribunal case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for an application for judicial review of patent unreasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review analysis on a judicial review application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review analysis in the context of statutory review and judicial deference? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the reasonableness standard of review in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the judicial review approach used by a court engaged in judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review to apply in a judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
