Assuming, therefore, that this choice of language is sufficient, I must ask one final question, namely, whether the approval of the subdivision is against the community's interest. No reasons have been provided. As Mackoff J. noted in Anderson v. Vancouver, supra, it is not sufficient for the approving officer to simply make such a bald statement and "While he need not set out elaborate reasons he, nonetheless, must give some valid reason for holding that in the circumstances of any given application it is against the public interest to permit a departure from the established pattern".
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.