The applicant’s position is that based upon the test outlined in Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001 SCC 94, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 1016, all he needs to demonstrate is (at para. 13): [T]hat such activities fall within the range of activities protected by s. 2(d) of the Charter, and . . . that the impugned legislation has, either in purpose or effect, interfered with these activities.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.