To conclude, in my opinion, the appellant’s complaint is not based on a misapprehension of the evidence at all, but on the judge’s weighing and interpretation of, or inferences from, the evidence. The appellant has not identified any palpable and overriding error in the judge’s interpretation of the medical evidence: Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33 at para. 25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.