The Appellant also argues that the application before the Master was premature and cites in support the decision in Lytton v. Alberta [1996] A.J. No. 895 which held that the application was premature because discoveries had not yet taken place, following which there would be a narrowing or better defining of the issues. Lytton involved 76 named plaintiffs and 200 yet-to-be named plaintiffs all proceeding against Alberta in claims for wrongful sterilization in a provincial institution, wrongful confinement, and a long list of other claims alleged to have occurred over several decades.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.