In Nash v. Snow, Topolniski J. held that the analysis under rule 4.33 relates to the real quality of what was done in the context of the real issues in dispute over a given period; it is not just that a process was undertaken. She considered that this analysis may “render less applicable certain cases where form rather than effect was a complete answer”: at paragraph 40.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.