In Enerflex v. Lynn, 2005 ABCA 62 the Alberta Court of Appeal per Picard J.A. stated at para. 8 that a lower court did not make an error of law: in choosing and applying the strong prima facie case test instead of the serious issue to be tried test... there is a great deal of authority for the former test in cases such as this when a restrictive covenant affecting employment is the central issue.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.