The agreement of purchase and sale acknowledges that the vendor has inspected the property and takes it, as is. There is no evidence of a misrepresentation, improper practices, or fraud. Still further, even should there be allegations of facts requiring a trial; there is no basis in law to establish a proposed claim for damages by the defendant upon the purchased property containing waste and environmentally sensitive materials. There is no allegation of a misrepresentation with regard to such materials. There is therefore a lack of a connection close, or otherwise, to activate a recognizable claim in equitable set off. See Holt v. Telford, 1987 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1987] 2 S.C.R. 193 at para. 33.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.