[39] The agent for the applicant’s representative herein submits that the principles enunciated in Regina v. Murphy, supra, apply to the case at bar. She argues that the pre-conceived statements and assertions set out in Officer Bendiks’ template/notes, which do not provide for any variation to conform with his actual observations at the material time, constitute “canned evidence” and that the particular statements cannot be considered to be sufficiently reliable so as to constitute full and adequate disclosure of the anticipated testimony of the said police officer.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.