I am in agreement with counsel for the Applicants. I find that the agency work performed was work which could have been completed by counsel. Although agency work of this type may be prudent and warranted as between solicitor and own client, it is not allowable in party-and-party costs which are limited by partial indemnity (see: Bayer AG v. Apotex Inc., [2002] F.C.J. No. 1693). For these reasons, I find that, for the purposes of this assessment, the payment for agency work is to be considered as a counsel fee which is included in the claim under Item 2 for which 4 units have been previously allowed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.