This last change in the law with respect to the effect of the mortgagee or bargainee taking possession under a chattel mortgage or bill of sale which, under the provisions of the Act, was void, was apparently intended to meet the observations made by some of the Judges in Ontario as to the difference between a mortgage or bill of sale which was void against creditors for non-compliance with the provisions of the Act as to registration, or in other matters, and one which “ceased to be valid” for want of renewal. (Heaton v. Flood, 29 O.R. 87).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.