What is the test for defamatory language in a letter to the board of directors of CCNH?

New Brunswick, Canada


The following excerpt is from Jones v Barton, 2014 NBQB 42 (CanLII):

43. The circumstances pertaining in Taylor v. Lamon are significantly different from the circumstances in this case. In Taylor v. Lamon both the plaintiff and defendant were members of the union, were both actively involved in union politics, and there was evidence that union members to whom the Special Appeal was sent were immune to the defamatory effects of harsh language. In the present case, the board of directors of CCNH were not immersed in the union culture and there was no evidence that otherwise defamatory remarks would have no effect upon them. In short, the context in Taylor v. Lamon is much different from the context in which the Board Letter was received.

Other Questions


Can a surety be bound to the letter of their agreement if the surety has been altered in a single line? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of care required by a medical malpractice board to treat a patient who has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does a letter of April 30, 2012 allege wrongdoing in a dental practice? (New Brunswick, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted privilege in letters between solicitor and client? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Does the duty of fairness extend to administrative tribunals? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision by an arbitrator? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the objective component of an ITO and what is the subjective component? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for submitting or attorning to a foreign court? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the "best interests of the child" in a custody dispute? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the common law test for shared custody of a child? (New Brunswick, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.