In Stephenson v. Bridges, 2018 BCSC 1155, Madam Justice Forth weighed the factors for and against granting leave under Rule 3-5(4) without reference to s. 22(2) of the Limitation Act. However, in that case, counsel agreed that the court had residual discretion under s. 22 to allow the filing of a third party notice after the expiry of a limitation period, citing (oddly, in my view) Herman. In the result, Madam Justice Forth denied leave.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.