Summary judgment applications present a particular challenge when new or unusual arguments are raised by a party. The common law develops over time, a process usually described as “slow and incremental ... based largely on the mechanism of extending an existing principle to new circumstances”. Sound policy reasons support this “judicial reluctance to dramatically recast established rules of law”: Watkins v. Olafson, 1989 CanLII 36 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 750, p. 760.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.