What is the basis for a finding that a judge gave insufficient weight to relevant considerations?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Kong v. Kong, 2010 BCCA 298 (CanLII):
The appellants’ argument that insufficient weight was given by the judge to relevant considerations, relies upon Stubban v. Stubban, 2002 BCCA 398 at para. 13.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a finding that a judge must not make a finding which would directly contradict a finding previously made by another judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a judge's failure to consider relevant evidence relevant to the issue of inter vivos gifts an error of law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge interfere with a trial judge's findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons for a finding that a trial judge erred in his or her appreciation of a relevant issue or of evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a trial judge fails to mention a relevant factor in the trial, does that mean that the relevant factor has not been considered? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a judge’s role as an appellate judge to second-guess the weight of evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge relitigate a finding in a motion where the original finding was invalid? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge quash a committal for trial if the presiding judge at the preliminary inquiry failed to observe a mandatory section of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an insufficient basis to order a lump sum award? (British Columbia, Canada)
