In Toronto v. C.U.P.E., Madam Justice Arbour in her comprehensive review of the law did recognize that in certain rare circumstances relitigation might be appropriate and could possibly enhance the integrity of the judicial process rather than detract from it. Examples given were: 1. a proceeding tainted by fraud or dishonesty; 2. fresh evidence, previously unavailable, conclusively impeaching the original result; 3. fairness dictates the original result should not be binding in the new context; [Toronto v. C.U.P.E., ¶52]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.