The case of Stokaluk v. Stokaluk, [2003] O.J. No. 3097 involved allegations of controlling and intrusive behaviour by the husband, in addition to allegations of his propensity to gamble, which would have put the wife’s equalization claim at risk, justifying an order for non-dissipation of assets against the Husband.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.