How have courts dealt with allegations of controlling and intrusive behaviour by the husband in a claim for non-dissipation of assets?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Taus v Harry, 2016 ONSC 219 (CanLII):
The case of Stokaluk v. Stokaluk, [2003] O.J. No. 3097 involved allegations of controlling and intrusive behaviour by the husband, in addition to allegations of his propensity to gamble, which would have put the wife’s equalization claim at risk, justifying an order for non-dissipation of assets against the Husband.
In Barrotti v. Barrotti, 1009 CanLII 64180, the respondent had surreptitiously and largely encumbered significant assets, had not fulfilled his disclosure obligations, and was in substantial default of the interim support order under which he was obligated.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have courts dealt with allegations of controlling and intrusive behaviour by the husband in the context of an equalization claim? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with a claim by the great aunt and her husband for state funded counsel in a child protection proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with an application where the applicant's disrespectful behaviour was so extreme that the application was dismissed as abuse of process? (Ontario, Canada)
When a husband ceases to work when he could be working, when the wife's income is limited by the husband's lack of income, is that husband's absence of work not a bar to a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order a husband to pay his ex-wife's taxes for the purchase of expensive cars that he allegedly diverted from the sale of property to fund his lifestyle? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the principles of the Court of Arbitration for the purpose of making decisions at an arbitrator rather than the court? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court dealt with a claim for minimum wage imputing income against the payor? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court not find there to be a lack of disclosure of assets between a husband and wife? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors will the court consider in determining the quantum of assets of the parties in a long-term disability claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion for a stay of execution pending a counter-claim, cross-claim and third party claim valid? (Ontario, Canada)
