Is there any case law where the trial judge used the same language as it used at bar as it did at trial?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sobolik v. Waters, 2010 BCCA 523 (CanLII):
In Stewart v. Berezan, 2007 BCCA 150, 64 B.C.L.R. (4th) 152, the trial judge had used similar language as was used in the case at bar. On appeal, Donald J.A. said at paras. 16-18:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the substantive right of a trial judge to discharge the jury and complete the trial himself? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the meaning of the term “ original position” used by the trial judge at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a trial judge fails to mention a relevant factor in the trial, does that mean that the relevant factor has not been considered? (British Columbia, Canada)
When there is a trial by judge and jury, what is the role of the judge in determining defamatory words? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge vary the degree of fault fixed by the trial judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge quash a committal for trial if the presiding judge at the preliminary inquiry failed to observe a mandatory section of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge interfere with a trial judge's findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge bound to comment upon all the evidence at trial to support an expert testimony? (British Columbia, Canada)
