Counsel for the appellant contends that the trial judge erred in fixing the respondent’s degree of fault at only 20 per cent. The respondent has cross-appealed, and contends that the trial judge erred in finding any contributory negligence. I find, with all due respect to the view of the trial judge, that I am unable to agree that he correctly apportioned fault between the parties. In Kolodychuk v. Squire, 23rd February 1972 (not reported), varied 1972 CanLII 147 (SCC), [1973] S.C.R. 303, 34 D.L.R. (3d) 265, McFarlane J.A., speaking for this court, varied the degrees of fault fixed by the trial judge. I am mindful of the caveat he expressed in doing so: “It has been said frequently that the cases must be rare in which an appellate court will interfere with a trial judge’s apportionment of blame while accepting his basic findings as to negligence.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.