As Kiteley J. held in Sprott v. Ohm,[9] a clinical issue is not needed for the court to order an assessment. Kiteley J. concluded that a s. 30 assessment was in the best interests of the two young children in that case for a variety of reasons, including that the parents had been unable to make any significant decisions about the children’s needs vis-à-vis the parenting schedule that would be in their best interests. The parents in Sprott also had vastly different perspectives on the needs of the children and on their respective capacities to respond to those needs.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.