When considering the reapportionment of the family assets of a medical malpractice practice, does Brooke J. make a reference to the issue of spousal support?

When considering the reapportionment of the family assets, Brooke J. made the following comments that are also relevant to the issue of spousal support: […] the core issue is what is an equitable sharing of the economic consequences of the marriage or its breakdown? In Moge v. Moge [citation omitted] … L’Heureux-Dubé J. observed that the equitable sharing of those economic consequences can be achieved by child and spousal support, the division of assets, or a combination of both. […] During the marriage, the plaintiff contributed her not inconsiderable talents and energies to the defendant’s practice and, in so doing, gave up her own opportunity to pursue a career in science. As a family, however, they enjoyed a standard of living commensurate with the family income.