I do not consider that reapportionment of the family assets as described above and an award of permanent spousal support based on both compensatory and non-compensatory grounds amounts to “double recovery” or “double dipping”. This is not a case that falls into the “potential pitfall” of double recovery: see Toth v. Toth at para. 59.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.