What is solicitor-client privilege for each of the documents set out above?
Yukon, Canada
The following excerpt is from Petrie v. AIG Insurance Company of Canada, 2019 YKSC 45 (CanLII):
These reasons focus on what I find to be solicitor-client privilege for each of the documents set out above, despite the stamp of litigation privilege in sub-paragraphs 5 and 6 above. I concluded that the test for litigation privilege addressed in Fred v. Westfair Food Ltd., 2003 YKSC 39, requiring affidavit evidence of litigation in reasonable prospect and dominant purpose was not required.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for express malice in the context of privileged privilege? (Yukon, Canada)
Is solicitor-client privilege an important component of the Canadian legal system? (Yukon, Canada)
Does qualified privilege apply to statements made by an employee to a supervisor? (Yukon, Canada)
What are the defences of qualified privilege and fair comment? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for incorporating a document in a statement of claim? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for an appeal from a discretionary order? (Yukon, Canada)
How has the court considered the potential prejudicial effect of excluding or excluding evidence of abuse in a sexual assault case? (Yukon, Canada)
Does a denial of a right to a fair hearing always render a decision invalid? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the test for determining jurisdiction over an offence? (Yukon, Canada)
What is the standard for assessment by the clerk under Rule 60(4) of the BC Tax Code? (Yukon, Canada)
