On an appeal from . . . a discretionary order, the applicable standard of review is that described by Cumming J.A. in Ward v. Kostiew (1989), 42 B.C.L.R. (2d) 121 (B.C.C.A.), at 127: . . . an appellate court is justified in interfering with the exercise of discretion by a chambers judge only if he misdirects himself, acts on a wrong principle or on irrelevant considerations, or if his decision is so clearly wrong as to amount to an injustice.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.