Binnie J. in Sheppard at paragraph 23 noted: “The absence of reasons, however, does not necessarily indicate an absence of such concentration”. This view is consistent with the courts dictum in Burns, where it was noted that trial judges are presumed to know the law and thus are not required to comment explicitly on all aspects of the evidence at trial. Sheppard, supra at paragraph 23 R v. Burns 1994 CanLII 127 (SCC), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 656 at p. 664.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.