Semple v. Semple (December 16, 1980 [summarized in 6 A.C.W.S. (2d) 317]) was another case in which the question of ouster was apparently not expressly considered. At p. 3 of his reasons, with reference to the matrimonial home, conceded to be a family asset, Mr. Justice Cromarty said: "The wife, however, claims a right to be compensated for its exclusive occupation by the husband for several years. She is entitled to this as a joint tenant."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.