In Seepa v. Seepa, a minimal evidentiary basis was made out where the youngest son stood to inherit the entire estate under a Will made four years before the deceased’s death. In a prior Will dated a year earlier, the son was to receive a 20 percent interest. The same lawyer drafted both Wills. Justice Meyers refers to the beneficiary’s physical proximity as caregiver to the testator; a joint account between the beneficiary and the testator; and that one of his other children were disinherited, amongst other points mentioned in para. 42.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.