There is no doubt in my mind that the defendant, plaintiff by counter claim should see that property be sold and that she should look to this property as a reasonable means of increasing her assets. Not only did she contribute financially to the acquisition of this property but she also did a lot of the work necessary to make it a livable home. There is no reason why she should be deprived of her one half interest any longer. I am satisfied that she fits right in the category of people contemplated by Becker v. Pettkus (supra).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.