The ultimate question is whether the order is in the interests of justice: Lu v. Mao, 2006 BCCA 560 at para. 6. There is a presumption in favour of granting security for costs where there is a serious question whether recovery may be difficult: Braich (Re), 2008 BCCA 354 at para. 6. The onus is on the appellant to establish why security for the costs of the appeal should not be ordered. I note that the appellant, although duly served, has filed no materials and has not appeared to meet that onus.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.