On this application for an order requiring the appellant to pay some costs and to post security for other costs, counsel agree that because the appellant is impecunious, the applicants bear the onus of establishing that the appeal is hopeless. When an appellant is impecunious, it is well settled that the court should be "very slow to order security in the absence of a finding that the appeal is frivolous, or something of that nature:" Milina v. Bartsch (1985), 5 C.P.C. (2d) 124, affirmed (1987), 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 99 (C.A.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.