It can therefore be said that there were three situations in which the rule in Saunders v. Vautier operated: 1. A beneficiary who was an adult, of sound mind, and entitled to the whole beneficial interest could require the trustee to transfer the trust property to him; 2. Several concurrently interested beneficiaries who were all adult, of sound mind, and between them entitled to the whole beneficial interest could collectively compel transfer; and 3. Several beneficiaries who were entitled in succession, whether their interests were vested or contingent, could combine to require transfer, provided they were all adult, of sound mind, and between them entitled to the whole beneficial trust interest.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.