What is the evidentiary burden of proving there is no genuine issue requiring a trial to merit summary judgment?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sheikh v. Sheikh, 2020 ONSC 668 (CanLII):
Once the moving party has satisfied the court there is no genuine issue requiring a trial to merit summary judgment, the evidentiary burden shifts to the responding party to show there is a triable issue after all: Sanzone v. Schechter, 2016 ONCA 566.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the evidentiary burden of proving there is no genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
If there is no genuine issue requiring a trial, can summary judgment be granted? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for granting summary judgment in a civil matter where there is no genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving there are no genuine issues requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a genuine issue for trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal burden of proving there is no genuine issue for trial? (Ontario, Canada)
In a summary judgment proceeding in a child protection case, is a bald allegation as to the existence of a parent-child relationship insufficient to raise a genuine issue for trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving there is no genuine issue for trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a genuine issue requiring a trial based on evidence filed without using Rule 20? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a summary judgment motion after a trial of the issue be directed? (Ontario, Canada)
