I am satisfied on the basis of the material filed, and having heard the cross examinations of the parties, that this is a case in which the basic presumption of equal division ought to govern the distribution of the assets. I am not persuaded that any asset should be excluded, however. The parties threw their assets together when they married, and, in view of the length of the marriage and the roles each took I do not think this an appropriate case for backing out the defendant’s pension entitlement (see Sangha v. Sangha, Vancouver No. D098246, May 7, 1998 (SCBC)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.