Does a plaintiff have to consider whether they discussed retirement with their physician before deciding to retire?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sorochan v. Bouchier, 2014 ABQB 37 (CanLII):
In Sacco v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia 1992 Vancouver Registry No. B870789, the court considered a number of factors including whether the plaintiff discussed possible retirement with his physician and also whether he considered taking further time off or claiming additional disability benefits prior to deciding to retire.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What considerations should be considered when deciding whether to grant severance to a party who has a claim against them? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors will a judge consider when deciding whether to split a husband's non-exempt property equally? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the appropriate retirement age for a retired person who would have retired at the age of 62? (Alberta, Canada)
What factors must the reviewing court consider in determining whether a decision is final or subject to appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
Is unconscionability a criterion for deciding whether to relieve against penalties for forfeitures? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to be considered a "part" of the motor vehicle by opening the door of the vehicle to open the passenger? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in her claim for wrongful dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether an occupier of a building is liable for damage caused to a plaintiff's property by an electrical shock? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a physician to determine whether a person has a testamentary capacity? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a duly qualified medical professional can examine a plaintiff pursuant to Rule 217? (Alberta, Canada)
