Second, it is not open to the court after the passage of more than 30 years to conclude that the City’s use of this land constitutes a non-natural use of the property. The landfill site served an important civic function at one time and still does and there is no evidence before the court that its former operation or its closure has impacted adversely on the health or safety of adjoining land owners. There are no noxious materials escaping from the landfill site onto the plaintiff’s property. Accordingly, the plaintiff cannot be granted relief under Rylands v. Fletcher doctrine. X TRESPASS
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.