I’m to consider the parties’ circumstances when the Corollary Relief Order was granted in deciding whether a change is material: RP v. RC, 2011 SCC 65 at paragraph 25. If a circumstance existed when the Corollary Relief Order was granted, that circumstance can’t be a material change. If the circumstance didn’t exist, but the parties actually contemplated it, the circumstance isn’t a material change: Dedes v. Dedes, 2015 BCCA 194 at paragraph 25.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.