The applicant argues that Roberts v. Bank of Toronto (1894), 25 O.R. 194, affirmed 21 O.A.R. 629, is authority for the proposition that a lien survives a loss of possession as a result of removal by the sheriff under execution or distress. I have read the case. It is not authority for the proposition. It is an interpleader turning expressly on the simple issue whether in fact the lien existed at the moment of seizure.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.