In Richter v. Richter, 2010 BCSC 1578, Melnick J. considered whether the expenses of hockey and lacrosse activities fell within the scope of s. 7 expenses. His comments as to the meaning of "reasonable" in the context of extracurricular activities are particularly apt, and so I have quoted from them at length. It is also of note that the incomes of the parties in Richter virtually mirror those of the parties in this case. The court said:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.