Does a lack of consultation preclude a finding that the expense of medical malpractice is reasonable and necessary?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from G.H. v. J.H., 2018 BCPC 412 (CanLII):

A lack of consultation, however, does not automatically preclude a finding that the expense is reasonable and necessary: Delichte v. Rogers, 2013 MBCA 106, 37 R.F.L. (7th) 81 (Man. C.A.) at paras. 39, 44.

Other Questions


Is it possible for a medical malpractice court to find medical negligence without receiving expert evidence on common prevailing professional standards? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the duty of disclosure of medical malpractice in medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BCSC treated records of medical malpractice in medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining the reasonableness of the expense of a spouse’s medical expenses? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a strong medical opinion support that a recommended treatment is both reasonable and necessary? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of accident-induced injuries on a plaintiff's ability to make a reasonable choice in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have medical and/or legal opinions been interpreted in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.