What is the case law on counselling?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Rex v. Yee Jam Hong, 1928 CanLII 119 (SK CA):
The evidence fully justifies the conviction on the charge of counselling although the offence was not actually committed. Rex v. Brousseau (1917) 1917 CanLII 628 (SCC), 56 S.C.R. 22.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When will counsel seek to compare facts in an instant cruelty case with those in the reported cases? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can an accused or his counsel waive procedural safeguards enacted for his benefit? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a consent judgment be set aside if the consent was executed by counsel and issued by the court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances has the learned judge not interfered with counsel’s examination? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What may have been the September 14 call to defence counsel by the deputy local registrar? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court order disclosure of a client's counselling records prior to trial? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have counsel pleaded paragraph 12 and then omitted to claim therefor in paragraph 13? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of conduct of counsel in defence of the Guidelines? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a police officer need to remain with the accused while counsel is giving instructions? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for disqualifying counsel on the grounds of a conflict of interest? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
