What may have been the September 14 call to defence counsel by the deputy local registrar?

This may have been what the September 14 call related to, but with the paucity of evidence on the purpose and nature of the call, such a conclusion would amount to nothing more than speculation. What is clear is that the first meaningful contact with defence counsel by the deputy local registrar was on November 1, 2006 when the pre-trials for these accused were scheduled for December 5, 2006. At these pre-trials, the defence gave the required informal notice that it intended to bring Charter applications based on delay. As a result, the pre-trials were adjourned with the following comments endorsed by the pre-trial judge on the both files: Queen v. Toy File 2013 Delay motion February 28/2007 accused will join in on the application. If successful these charges will be stayed. Pre-trial adjourned until motion argued. If unsuccessful I will reconvene pre-trial.