While in most cases the applicable limitation period can be readily ascertained from the pleaded facts giving rise to a cause of action without regard to the remedy claimed, a claim for the imposition of a remedial constructive trust is different. The parties’ relationship may permit or require the imposition of a remedial constructive trust over property with retroactive effect: see Rawluk v. Rawluk, 1990 CanLII 152 (SCC), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 70. Only when the remedy is granted can it be said with confidence that the relationship between the parties carried the “trust-like” obligation to return the property subject to the imposition of the trust.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.